Artificial Intelligence And Smart Arbitration In Resolving Disputes In Islamic Financial Institutions
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Smart Arbitration, Islamic Finance, Dispute Resolution, Sharia Compliance.Abstract
The rapid expansion of Islamic financial institutions has increased the complexity of dispute resolution in sharia-based financial transactions. Conventional arbitration mechanisms often face challenges related to efficiency, cost, and transparency. Artificial intelligence offers new opportunities to improve arbitration systems through automation, predictive analytics, and digital decision-support tools. This study examines the potential role of artificial intelligence in developing smart arbitration mechanisms for resolving disputes in Islamic financial institutions. The research applies a qualitative approach using doctrinal legal analysis and a conceptual review of emerging technological frameworks in dispute resolution. The findings indicate that artificial intelligence can support arbitration processes through case classification, legal reasoning assistance, document analysis, and predictive decision systems aligned with sharia principles. Smart arbitration systems may enhance procedural efficiency, increase transparency, and strengthen access to justice for financial stakeholders. Ethical governance, regulatory oversight, and compliance with Islamic legal norms remain essential considerations in implementing AI-based arbitration mechanisms. The study contributes to the development of technology-driven dispute resolution frameworks within the context of Islamic finance.
References
Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech and regtech in a nutshell, and the future in a sandbox. Research Foundation Briefs, 3(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3088303
Ashley, K. D. (2017). Artificial intelligence and legal analytics: New tools for law practice in the digital age. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316761380
Blemus, S. (2020). Law and blockchain: A legal perspective on current regulatory trends worldwide. Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Financier, 2, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3080639
Brownsword, R., Yeung, K., & Scotford, E. (2017). The Oxford handbook of law, regulation and technology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199680832.001.0001
Casey, A. J., & Niblett, A. (2016). The death of rules and standards. Indiana Law Journal, 92(4), 1401–1447. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2692563
Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the “good society”: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
De Filippi, P., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain and the law: The rule of code. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674985926
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Hassan, M. K., & Aliyu, S. (2018). A contemporary survey of Islamic banking literature. Journal of Financial Stability, 34, 12–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.11.006
Katz, D. M., Bommarito, M. J., & Blackman, J. (2017). A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0174698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174698
Khan, M. F. (2021). Arbitration and dispute resolution in Islamic finance. Arab Law Quarterly, 35(4), 356–378. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10073
Malaysia International Islamic Financial Centre (MIFC). (2023). Islamic finance industry outlook. https://www.mifc.com
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
Oseni, U. A., & Ali, S. N. (2019). Fintech in Islamic finance: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351025584
Scherer, M. U. (2019). Artificial intelligence and legal decision-making: The wide open? Study on the example of arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 36(5), 539–574. https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2019027
Smits, J. M. (2015). What is legal doctrine? On the aims and methods of legal-doctrinal research. Rob van Gestel, Hans-W. Micklitz & Edward L. Rubin (Eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644088
Surden, H. (2019). Artificial intelligence and law: An overview. Georgia State University Law Review, 35(4), 1305–1337. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3411869
Van Hoecke, M. (2011). Legal doctrine: Which method(s) for what kind of discipline? In M. Van Hoecke (Ed.), Methodologies of legal research: Which kind of method for what kind of discipline? Oxford: Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781847317841
