Initiating Islamic Education Innovation to Enhance Institutional Competitiveness: A Multisite Study at MAN 2 Tulungagung and MAN 2 Kediri
Keywords:
Islamic Education Innovation, Initiation Stage, Institutional Competitiveness, MadrasahAbstract
This study aims to analyze the initiation stage of Islamic education innovation in enhancing institutional competitiveness through a multisite study at MAN 2 Tulungagung and MAN 2 Kediri, Indonesia. The initiation phase is a strategic starting point that includes problem identification, awareness building, attitude formation, and decision-making toward innovation implementation. This research employs a qualitative approach with a phenomenological design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña with triangulation to ensure trustworthiness. The findings indicate that the initiation of innovation in both madrasahs is driven by benchmarking activities, internal discussions, and the awareness of improving educational quality in response to contemporary challenges. The innovation is initiated through the development of talent- and interest-based curricula aligned with the Merdeka Curriculum, supported by psychometric assessments to map students’ potential. In addition, teacher capacity is strengthened through continuous training and the adoption of differentiated learning approaches. MAN 2 Tulungagung initiates innovation through the establishment of specialized classes and digital administrative systems, while MAN 2 Kediri emphasizes a holistic approach integrating intracurricular, cocurricular, and extracurricular programs under the “red carpet” philosophy. These initiatives contribute to improving student achievement, institutional branding, and overall competitiveness. In conclusion, the initiation stage plays a crucial role in shaping sustainable innovation by integrating intellectual, spiritual, and character development, thereby strengthening the competitiveness of Islamic educational institutions.
References
[1] United Nations, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY, USA: UN, 2015.
[2] UNESCO, “Education for Sustainable Development: A Roadmap,” Paris, France, 2020.
[3] M. Fullan, The New Meaning of Educational Change, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press, 2020.
[4] A. Azra, “Islamic education and reintegration of knowledge,” Stud. Islam., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2019.
[5] J. Hattie, Visible Learning: The Sequel. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2023.
[6] A. Schleicher, “World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System,” Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
[7] D. Hung, “Innovation in learning: Challenges and opportunities,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 695–699, 2020.
[8] S. H. Al-Attas, Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 2019.
[9] W. C. Chandra and M. Suyanto, “Holistic education in Islamic perspective,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 101–112, 2021.
[10] E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 2003.
[11] T. Greenhalgh et al., “Diffusion of innovations in service organizations,” Milbank Q., vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 581–629, 2004.
[12] J. Damanpour and R. M. Schneider, “Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption,” Organ. Stud., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 45–65, 2019.
[13] M. Bush, Educational Leadership and Management, 5th ed. London, U.K.: Sage, 2020.
[14] Ministry of Religious Affairs Indonesia, “Kurikulum Merdeka Guidelines,” Jakarta, 2022.
[15] H. Retnawati et al., “Differentiated learning in Indonesian education,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 33–48, 2021.
[16] S. Tomlinson, How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms, 3rd ed. Alexandria, VA, USA: ASCD, 2020.
[17] R. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2018.
[18] C. Moustakas, Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 1994.
[19] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2018.
[20] R. Stake, Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press, 2006.
[21] J. Damanpour, “Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 555–590, 2019.
[22] M. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2019.
[23] B. Merriam and E. Tisdell, Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2019.
[24] L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 8th ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2018.
[25] M. Miles, A. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 2020.
[26] Y. Lincoln and E. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage, 1985.
[27] P. Sallis, Total Quality Management in Education, 3rd ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2019.
[28] A. Karim and M. Fauzi, “Benchmarking strategy in Islamic schools,” J. Educ. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2021.
[29] OECD, “Innovative Learning Environments,” Paris: OECD, 2020.
[30] H. Zhao, “Personalized learning in the digital age,” Comput. Educ., vol. 168, 2021.
[31] J. Kotter, Leading Change. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business Review Press, 2019.
[32] M. E. Porter, Competitive Advantage. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 2008.
[33] UNESCO, “Reimagining our futures together,” Paris, 2021.
[34] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2019.
[35] J. Biggs and C. Tang, Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 5th ed. Maidenhead, U.K.: McGraw-Hill, 2018.
[36] L. Darling-Hammond, “Teacher professional development,” Educ. Policy, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1–25, 2020.
[37] S. Marginson, “Global competition in higher education,” High. Educ., vol. 79, pp. 1–19, 2020.
[38] H. Mintzberg, Managing. San Francisco, CA, USA: Berrett-Koehler, 2019.
[39] J. Elkington, Green Swans: The Coming Boom in Regenerative Capitalism. London, U.K.: Fast Company Press, 2020.
