The Dynamics of Habituation in the Whirlwind of Gentrification: A Case Study in the Prawirotaman Tourism Village, Yogyakarta City
Keywords:
Habituation, Gentrification, Tourism Village, Prawirotaman, Cultural ResilienceAbstract
Modernity that occurs naturally brings many developmental changes, one of which is in the tourism sector. This change is often known as the phenomenon of gentrification. The gentrification phenomenon in the Prawirotaman Tourism Village area of Yogyakarta City is now known as the Bule Village or International Village. Prawirotaman has undergone massive spatial and functional transformation, where residents' domestic spaces have shifted functions into commercial spaces of a global scale. This change then requires the local community to make massive adjustments to the dominance of tourism functions. This study aims to describe how local residents adapt their behavior and survival strategies to form a new habitus amidst the economic and cultural order of newcomers/tourists. Using a descriptive qualitative method with Pierre Bourdieu's sociological approach, data were collected through field observation, in-depth interviews with local residents and business actors, and documentation studies. The analysis focused on the shifts in cultural capital, social capital, and economic modes owned by residents. The research results show that gentrification in Prawirotaman not only causes gradual physical displacement, but also forces the occurrence of forced habituation through: (1) spatial gentrification, where residents adapt a hospitality lifestyle in response to the needs of the tourism industry; (2) glocalization, the emergence of hybrid behavior between traditional Javanese values and a cosmopolitan lifestyle; and (3) socio-cultural resilience in the form of efforts to maintain communal spaces (such as the tradition of ronda or residents greeting each other) amid the domination of private commercial spaces (cafes and hotels). Thus, it can be concluded that the adaptation strategies manifested in these three findings are a manifestation of the gentrification dynamics occurring in Kampung Wisata Prawirotaman.
References
1] A. Wansaka, U. G. Mada, K. Sleman, D. I. Yogyakarta, and K. Prawirotaman, “SEJARAH KAMPUNG PRAWIROTAMAN : TRANSFORMASI DARI KAMPUNG BATIK KE KAWASAN PENGINAPAN , 1950-2000,” 2000.
[2] M. B. Alauddin, M. Iftironi, I. Y. Fauziah, E. Perkasa, R. A. Chania, and R. P. Firdaus, “Perubahan Pola Pemanfaatan Ruang Terkait Rencana Detail Tata Ruang Pada Kawasan Prawirotamanyang Disebabkan Oleh Perkembangan Kawasan Komersial,” Univ. Islam Indones. , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 277–286, 2024.
[3] D. Ratna, N.-R. Astuti, T. Mumfangati, H. Muryantoro, -I W Pantja, and S.-S. Sumarsih, Dari Hut an Bering an Ke Ibukot a Daerah Istimew a.
[4] Y. B. Prakoso and A. Rolalisasi, “Revitalisasi Pasar Tradisional di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Pasa Ateh Bukittinggi dan Pasar Prawirotaman Yogyakarta,” J. Lingkung. Karya Arsit., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2025, doi: 10.37477/lkr.v4i1.708.
[5] H. Widianto and Y. Keban, “Gentrifikasi: Dampak Sosial-Ekonomi Pembangunan Hotel di Malioboro Kota Yogyakarta,” 2020.
[6] R. Alam Raya et al., “Pelestarian Kesenian dan Budaya Melalui Pentas Seni ‘Karyo Budoyo’ Dalam Rangka Semarak Memperingati Hari Kemerdekaan Indonesia Ke-79 Di Desa Mulyasari,” J. Pengabdi. Masy. SAC, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2024.
[7] Y. Nugraheni and R. Puspa, “Cultural Perspectives in Corporate Culture Studies: Research Opportunities and Developments in Indonesia,” Society, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 758–770, 2023, doi: 10.33019/society.v11i2.561.
[8] S. Maryunani, T. Simatupang, and I. Mirzanti, “Art as an Urban Lifeline: Mental Well-Being in Times of Crisis and Conflict,”
[9] D. Anggraeni, B. M. Sigalingging, and G. B. Putra, “Hilirization of Tourism of Central Bangka with Amazing Bateng Bilingual Application,” Society, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 681–694, 2022, doi: 10.33019/society.v10i2.378.
[10] D. D. Kuncoro and D. Pramitasari, “Pengaruh Ketersediaan Amenitas pada Wisata Malam terhadap Kenyamanan Aksesibilitas Masyarakat Kampung Prawirotaman,” Sinektika J. Arsit., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2024, doi: 10.23917/sinektika.vi.3145.
[11] S. I. Selvia, M. S. Roychansyah, and F. H. Prasetyo, “Transformasi Fisik, Sosial dan Ekonomi yang Mempengaruhi Terjadinya Jentrifikasi Pariwisata di Kampung Prawirotaman Yogyakarta,” J. Pembang. Wil. dan Kota, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 433–452, 2025, doi: 10.14710/pwk.v21i3.70750.
[12] P. P. Pratiyudha, “Gentrifikasi dan akar-akar masalah sosial: menakar identifikasi, diagnosis, dan treatment proses gentrifikasi sebagai masalah sosial,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2019.
[13] S. Mangihut, “Teori ‘Gado-Gado’ Pierre-Felix Bourdieu,” J. Stud. Kult., vol. I, no. 2, pp. 79–82, 2016.
[14] P. Bourdieu, “The forms of capital,” Sociol. Econ. Life, Third Ed., pp. 78–92, 2018, doi: 10.4324/9780429494338.
[15] J. W. Creswell, “BUKU CROSWELL - Design Research Quantitatif Qualitatif,” 2010.
[16] A. Hadi, Asrori, and Rusman, Penelitian kualitatif studi fenomenologi, case study, grounded theory, etnografi, biografi [Qualitative research: phenomenological studies, case studies, grounded theory, ethnography, biography]. 2021.
[17] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R &Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D.Bandung:Alfabeta. 2016.
[18] I. Amrozi, D. Riandy, P. Sultansyah, A. Millah, and N. Aulia, “Kelompok Milenial dan Tantangan Pembangunan Kota : Gentrifikasi dan Komersialisasi Ruang di Kota Yogyakarta,” vol. 10, no. Bps 2020, pp. 115–130, 2022, doi: 10.22146/studipemudaugm.69230.
[19] J. Pradono, R. Soerachman, N. Kusumawardani, and Kasnodiharjo, Panduan Penelitian dn Pelaporan Penelitian Kualitatif.
[20] P. Bourdieu, “The Logic of Practice”.
[21] L. Purbosari, “Cultural Shock Wisatawan,” 2017.
[22] E. Sugiarto, “DAMPAK SOSIAL PARIWISATA DI KAMPUNG TURIS PRAWIROTAMAN: SEBUAH KAJIAN LITERATUR,” vol. 2, pp. 114–130, 202AD.
[23] R. K. Dan, K. Miliader, D. Tlobo, and K. Jatiyoso, “HABITUASI PADA WISATAWAN,” pp. 734–750, 2024.
[24] H. C. Diartho, F. W. Prianto, and A. F. Nisa, “Sustainable Rural Development in Osing Traditional Village, Banyuwangi Regency: A Perspective from the Sustainable Livelihood Approach,” Society, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 72–87, 2025, doi: 10.33019/society.v13i1.776.
[25] D. Puspitasari, “Alienasi Dan Glokalisasi Bahasa Jawa Sebuah Studi Fenomenologi Di Kota Surakarta,” J. Anal. Sosiol. Oktober, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 201–212, 2018.
[26] T. Medvetz and J. Sallaz, The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu.
[27] M. Puspitasari, F. N. Rahmat, E. Pramesti, A. Nurfiani, M. R. Tirtanawati, and C. H. W. Prastiwi, “Program ‘Omah Seni’ untuk Optimalisasi Kreativitas pada Generasi Alfa dan Z di Era Digital,” Amalee Indones. J. Community Res. Engagem., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 317–329, 2022, doi: 10.37680/amalee.v3i2.1914.
[28] M. A. Kusumaningtyas, I. Z. Nurudin, and D. Wiratmoko, “Social , Economic , and Spatial Transformation of the Prawirotaman Urban Kampung in Yogyakarta,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 92–103, 2026.
[29] D. I. Wilayah and P. Kota, “Vol 28 No 2 Tahun 2023 STUDI LITERATUR : KAJIAN FENOMENA GENTRIFIKASI,” vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 139–154, 2023.
[30] A. K. Adhirya Kurn and M. A. Kurniawan, “Revitalisasi Pasar Prawirotaman Menjadi Pasar Kreatif,” J. Arsit. Zo., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2020.
[31] A. Nurwitasari, V. Gaffar, L. A. Wibowo, and M. A. Sultan, “Gastronomy Tourism Promotion: The Uniqueness of Culinary Attraction and Storytelling,” Society, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 943–960, 2024, doi: 10.33019/society.v12i2.758.
